Sunday 14 September 2014

Google's Safe Browsing service is killing your privacy

  Google Safe Browsing is a service through which Google provides lists of URLs (addresses) of websites that contain malware or phishing content.

  These lists of suspicious sites are continuously updated using Google's web crawlers, programs that scour the web to index sites for Google's search engine.

  Lists from the Google Safe Browsing service are used by browsers such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and apple Safari for checking web-pages users are trying to access against potential threats.

  The service issues alerts when they are about to open websites or content Google has classified as malicious. The warnings are display as 'visual messages' along with specific details relating to the malicious content concerned.

  The service is also designed to block the downloading of files infected with malware and, once a user's computer has been infected, it can issue instructions on how to detect and remove the malware.

  Members of the public can also access the lists of unsafe sites via a public API for the service. [An API, or application program interface, is a set of instructions that specifies the functions or routines required to accomplish a specific task, such as reading a particular list of websites.]

  In addition, Google uses its Safe Browsing service to send internet service providers e-mail alerts regarding threats hosted on their networks.

  More than one billion internet users are currently using the Safe Browsing service, either directly or indirectly and, according to Google, it is issuing three million warnings a week.

  The service is acknowledged as being highly efficient in protecting users from malware and phishing attacks.

Privacy concerns with Google's Safe Browsing service

  When using Google's public API (the Safe Browsing Lookup API) to check out a suspicious webpage, members of the public who are concerned about their privacy need to be cautious. The URLs (addresses) to be look up are not hashed (encrypted) so the Google server knows which URLs have been looked up using this API. This makes tracking your online activities ultra-easy.

  The Firefox and Safari browsers however use a second version of the API, Safe Browsing API v2, to exchange data with the server. This uses hashed URLs so the Google server never knows the actual URLs queried by the user.

 However the Safe Browsing API also stores a cookie on the user's computer which the NSA (US National Security Agency) uses to identify individual computers. This is a mandatory requirement that many users feel is acceptable as it helps them feel safe.

  In addition, Google stores another cookie on the user's computer that can be used to identify the IP addresses the user visits, ie can be used to track him or her.

  Google's excuse is that the tracking cookie logs this data in order to prevent DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attacks. That may be so.

  The API in the user's browser (eg, Chrome) will 'phone home' every few hours to check for updates to its list of malicious sites. At the same time it sends a payload that includes the machine's ID and the user's ID.

Should you turn off Google's Safe Browsing service?

  Even if you trust Google not to use your information without your permission or for some nefarious purpose, there is a potential risk that it can be picked up by a malicious third party when it is being echoed back across the internet to Google from your browser.

  The only way to prevent this is to disable the Safe Browsing feature in your browser, which is on by default.

 This is a real bummer as you would be turning off a great service.

 But that's what you've got to do if you don't want to be tracked.

  When making up your mind about whether to turn off Safe Browsing or not, you should bear in mind that even if the information that is tracked is not hacked, it is available to be accessed under a court warrant or at the request of the US NSA.

 The good news from Google is that Google only retains the data for two weeks and then deletes it.

 Not so, say some researchers, who believe that after two weeks the data is anonymized, ie names and other identifying features are removed, and stored in aggregate form.

 If this is true then having just the user's IP address, the cookie and timestamp would be enough information to decloak someone for something they may have done years before.



Google Glass With Real-Time Emotion Detection App

        The latest update on Google Glass is its newly created first real-time emotion detection app, which is developed by Fraunhofer Institute in Germany.

       The app is quite phenomenal as it accurately detects one's age and gender. The app works on-board that is, the cloud is not used.

     This is because the data used might be sensitive and thus, never leaves the Glass device. The emotion detection app would be perfect for people with autism, who face difficulty while depicting their emotions.

   The new app is built on SHORE (Sophisticated High-speed Object Recognition Engine) system.

    The SHORE started with just object-detection system on computers, however with time the system has developed into fine facial analysis system. The system has 91% and 94% success rate at picking out a user's face and gender, respectively.

    While talking about the drawback of the marvelous innovation, privacy is a big concern here. Albeit Fraunhofer has stressed upon its privacy factors, which explicate that the data never leaves the Glass device and the app is unable to find out the identity of the people you look at; still there is a big loophole, as the app is able to do both of these things.

        It is just a matter of time that someone unwinds these features and enables facial recognition.

     Then again, there will be negative implications but on the whole the positive ones will outnumber them. One can argue even on its positive aspects. For instance, while waking in public, you can know if a person (potential mugger) is looking at you with aggression. Or it could tell you about the person who you are trying to find out in a confluence of people. So you know what would be its advantages.

     Agreed, that we cannot just forego the privacy concerns, but what we are missing is that the private agencies and different government agencies have already released wide-scale facial detection systems, so it won't be wrong to say that the cat's already out of the bag.

     The continuous corrosion of privacy via smartphones, internet and wearable computers is bit daunting, but imagine if the police forces can use the same technology for controlling the hideous acts and catching criminals; should we still be talking about the trivial issues that Google Glass will bring?

Well, this might be a never ending debate. However, we all know how mobile innovation became a daily life necessity, same way the face recognition technology is building momentum and in the near future this will become inevitable either.